Q: Why will I never fully embrace winter flying?
A: I haven’t the heuvos.
Consider:
Posted in canoe on January 27, 2008| 2 Comments »
I cut out the second upper panel piece of the canoe today, again using the circular saw. This cut did not go very well. The blade kicked back a couple of times, resulting in nasty edges like this:
Again, I’m sure glad I’m not working with $300 worth of wood!!
The blade retention nut also worked its way loose again, which besides being somewhat scary interrupts the cut and causes another rough spot in the edge when I start again. When I got to the bow, I just made a rough cut, thinking I’d go back with the jigsaw and clean it up:
That worked very well:
As I was trying to hand sand away the messy edge the circular saw had made, I got to thinking that it really strains credulity that the jigsaw could possibly be any worse, and that I ought to give it a try on the next piece:
As you can see, the fear of a wavy edge was well founded, so I anticipate using every bit of the 1/4″ latitude promised by the designer:
On the plus side, in addition to being marginally easier on my aching back since I didn’t have to get down on my knees and fight my way down the cut with a recalcitrant circular saw, the jigsaw made a much cleaner edge and a lot less of the burning wood stench I get from the circular saw. Well, to be fair, the cleaner edge aspect only lasted right up until I got to the last inch of the bow and the part broke away because I hadn’t thought to go back and support it with the sawhorses as I cut past them:
That was easily remedied, and I learned a lesson about supporting the part better as I cut. Well, partially learned the lesson, anyway, as we will soon see.
The edges from the jigsaw cut are a bit wavier than the circular saw edges, and it remains to be seen if this is an acceptable trade-off for the cleaner, easier cut:
So, what did I mean about only partially learning the lesson of moving the sawhorses to support the areas that I had already cut? Well, I sure didn’t see this coming, did I:
When I lined up the two bottom pieces, I found that something had gone horribly awry somewhere:
When I flip one of the pieces over they match far more closely, so the error is not in the tracing or cutting, but in the initial measuring or outlining. I can go ahead and build it this way, but the boat will most likely have an inherent banana shape to it. I’m tempted to do it anyway since 1) it’s within tolerance, and 2) just to watch hilarity ensue as Co-pilot Egg struggles to figure out why she can’t keep the darn thing straight! Actually, stretched across a 14′ boat doing 3 mph, I’m not sure it will matter very much. Decisions like this, in a nutshell, are why I should probably never build an airplane!
Posted in Uncategorized on January 24, 2008| Leave a Comment »
After having torn the engine down to the nuts, bolts, and crankshaft level, we spent some time measuring the dimensions of the crank shaft, connecting rods, piston pins, etc. The tolerances are measured down to 1/10,000″ (or .0001″, for those that prefer), but since I consider anything beyond .001″ tolerance as measured with a micrometer to be no more accurate than a random number generator, we were pretty much just going through the motions.
We were able to get the crankshaft and camshaft installed and the crankcase halves put back together before we ran out of class time. Those were the easy parts, of course. Now we have to figure out where all of the little bits go. That’s a daunting prospect!
Posted in canoe on January 20, 2008| Leave a Comment »
At some point late last night, I woke up thinking that I had better cut the bottom piece of the boat before I cut the second side piece. The bottom piece is centered in the 4′ x 8′ piece of plywood, and the measurements are from the long edges. If I were to cut the second side piece, the edge that I need to measure to the center piece marks would be gone. With that in mind, I laid out the center piece marks and drew the curved lines:
(Note that I deliberately blurred the plans in this picture. I got to thinking that Bateau wouldn’t be thrilled with having high resolution pictures of their plans on the internet)
The cutting went a little easier this time since there were no real tight turns to make:
The next step will be to cut out three more of the side pieces and one more of the bottom piece. I’m going to use the parts I’ve already cut out as templates to draw the cut lines for the other pieces. Even with that, the parts will no doubt have slightly different dimensions because I am by no means precise when wielding the circular saw. I think when I get the rest of the parts cut, I’ll stack them up with their brethren and see if I can get them all into roughly the same shape by sanding the edges.
Posted in canoe on January 19, 2008| 3 Comments »
Ah, it’s Miller Time. As I sit here savoring an ice cold beer, I can still smell the odor of burning plywood permeating the entire house. I spent a few hours working on the canoe, specifically marking and cutting the first piece out of the plywood. Let me just start out by saying that I’m very glad that I’m not $300 into this wood!
The marking went well enough, but there was one instance of mis-measuring. I’ve taken to using the 1″ marking as the end of the straight edge because the 0″ mark (or the end of the straight edge if you prefer) is kind of dinged up and I don’t overly trust it to be true. The problem with this comes in when I forget to add an inch to the mark I’m measuring from. So, what ended up happening is that a mark that should have been at 3 3/8″ ended up being at 2 3/8″. The tip-off that something was awry came when the PVC pipe refused to make a nice radius. That prompted me to re-measure and find the problem. Once the first marks were in place (correctly), I nailed the PVC into place by pushing it against a nail pounded in at the mark and holding it in place with another nail on the other side:
I simply ran a Sharpie along the edge of the PVC to make the line that I would (attempt to) follow with the circular saw.
The bow has a one inch camber (mostly for aesthetic reasons, I think) that I drew by measuring half of the distance from the two front points, then measuring an inch from that line. I pounded a nail in at that mark, then tried to bend the PVC around it to get a good curve. The PVC was reluctant to make such a tight turn, so I ended up having to hold it in place while I drew the line. I wish I had a picture of what it took to do it, but since I don’t, just visualize a game of one-man Twister. I ended up with one hand holding the PVC, knees brought into play in various areas, and the other hand both holding the PVC and wielding the Sharpie. It all turned out ok, though:
The second long line was pretty much like the the first, but without the mis-measurement. That done, I was ready for the first cut:
I set the cut depth on the saw at 1/4″, but for reasons running from the 150 tooth blade (versus the 20 tooth default blade) to the fact that this is the cheapest saw money can buy, it took no less than six adjustments to get it set at the right depth:
As I cut along the long edges, the saw would bog down whenever I had to follow the gentle curvature of the lines. I was pretty sure that this meant following the camber of the bow was going to be a real bear, and I was right. Even with the maximum turn that I could make (which is where the burned wood smell that I am still enjoying came from), I couldn’t get it to follow that tight of a radius. I ended up just doing it in two cuts:
With the blade depth set where I had it, I got all the way through the wood, but there were marks here and there on the OSB that demonstrated why I wanted to have it under there in the first place. Those were spots where the saw blade would have come into contact with the basement floor, and I really didn’t think that would be a good idea.
So, here’s the first part, all cut out:
Posted in AP School on January 18, 2008| Leave a Comment »
When I last wrote on the topic of A&P school, we had removed the O-320 from the Piper Cherokee in order to tear it down and see if we could determine why it was eating its sparkplugs. Since then, we’ve removed the cylinders and pistons, all of the accessories, and split the crankcase. We were careful to look for foreign objects in the cylinders and/or exhaust as we did so, but found nothing. What we did find was that in cylinders 1, 2, and 4, the pistons, the valves, and the inner surfaces of the cyliner heads were beat to hell and back. They look like an over zealous antique furniture counterfeiter went after them with a small length of chain. Every inch of the surfaces was nicked and scratched. If you imagine what it would look like if you tossed a hardened steel washer into the cylinder and ran it for an hour, you have a good idea of what condition these parts are in. And, we have no way to explain what happened!
We’re going through the instructional exercise of precisely measuring all of the innards, determining a multitude of arcane things like washout, rod bearing journal diameters, piston pin diamter, etc. before putting it all back together. With the limited budget the school has, there’s no way that they’re buying new pistons and cylinders, so we’re going to reassemble it with the ones we have and hope that it runs. The reassembly is not going to be easy; the same level of conscientious marking of parts and their locations that was exhibited when removing the engine from the airplane (which is to say “none”) went into its disassembly. Nuts, bolts, clamps, etc. are all neatly piled in abject disarray in a tin pan. It’s going to be interesting trying to sort all of that out!
Posted in AP School on January 10, 2008| Leave a Comment »
The class schedule has finally rolled around to the two things that I required before starting again: a subject interesting to a piston engine airplane owner, and a class not taught by the former instructor that I had so many problems with.
Class actually started Monday night, and one of the first topics covered was the syllabus. There has been a significant change to this class, as it turns out. This used to be the engine overhaul class, but the focus has shifted to maintenance. While I was initially a little disappointed in the change (I have been looking forward to tearing an engine apart for a couple of years), I soon realized that this is a very positive move. In reality, the chances of my ever overhauling an engine are so close to nil that they could safely be described as “never.” Maintenance, on the other hand, well, that happens all the time.
Tonight we got our team project assignments, and you can rest assured that I wasted no time volunteering for the three person team that is assigned to remove the O-320 from the Piper Cherokee and tear it down in an attempt to determine why it is destroying the electrodes of both spark plugs in the #1 cylinder within just a few minutes of run time. The first step was obvious: remove the engine from the airplane, bring it into the shop, and tear it apart. I had asked last year whether we would ever have the opportunity to remove an engine, and was told no. With the change in the focus of the class, that disappointing answer has obviously changed.
It turns out that removing an engine is fairly easy for three guys to do in just a couple of hours. I can safely predict, though, that it’s going to be one hell of a lot harder to put back on! The airplane was somewhat unfortunately located in the hangar – it was within a couple of feet of the drainage grates. Of course, I managed to get two washers to roll straight into the grates after dropping them. Like a magnet, I’m telling you, those grates are just like a big magnet!
We got the engine into the shop and removed the alternator, magnetos, vacuum pump, valve covers, and a good bit of the baffling (I’m baffled as to how I’m going to get a wrench onto the last nut, though – it’s a tight fit) before we ran out of time. The “tool” classes go a lot faster than those interminable lectures last year, and I’m looking forward to going back next Monday.